DISCUSSION
Rational Incompetence of Voters
Volume 30, Number 2, April 2025, Pages 329–338
PDFAbstract
One of the biggest debates on the functioning of democracy concerns voter competence. It is sometimes claimed that voters are incompetent due to unreasonableness and ignorance, which has led some to advocate decision-making by experts—that is, epistocracy. However, in this paper, I show that under certain conditions—namely, asymmetric information signals—reasonable and non-ignorant voters can still be incompetent, even in the absence of misleading information. This rational incompetence can be a threat to democracy, but it can be a threat to epistocracy just as well, and for the same reason. Experts may be more rational than other citizens, but rationality does not necessarily imply competence.
Copyright © 2025 Susumu Cato
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|
Weak Independence Is Sufficient for Making Weak Superiority Collapse into Strong Superiority
Susumu Cato
Murderers on the Ballot Paper: Bad Apples, Moral Compromise, and the Epistemic Value of Public Deliberation in Representative Democracies
Richard Beadon Williams
The Right to Mental Autonomy: Its Nature and Scope
William Ratoff
Why Paternalists Must Endorse Epistocracy
Jason Brennan and Christopher Freiman
Is Epistocracy Irrational?
Adam F. Gibbons
Political Disagreement and Minimal Epistocracy
Adam F. Gibbons
Irrationality and Happiness: A (Neo)-Schopenhaurian Argument for Rational Pessimism
Alexandre Billon
This paper has not yet been cited.
