Volume 12, Number 2
November 2017
DISCUSSION

Consent and Deception

Volume 12, Number 2, November 2017, Pages 223–229
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i2.192
PDFPDF

Abstract

Tom Dougherty has recently defended the claim that all deception that is consequential for sex is seriously wrong. This discussion piece argues that deception does not have to seriously undermine consent and that when sexual deception is seriously wrong, that may not only be to do with its relation to consent. In doing so, it defends distinguishing between the seriousness of deceptions, whether these are sexual or in other areas of life, and so defends what Dougherty calls the lenient view.
Copyright © 2017 Robert Jubb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Sulking into Sex: Blame, Coercion, and Consent

Sumeet Patwardhan

Utilitarianism, Altruism, and Consent

Christopher J. G. Meacham

The Case for Consent Pluralism

Jessica Keiser

The Value of Uptake

Anni Räty

Are All Deceptions Manipulative or All Manipulations Deceptive?

Shlomo Cohen

Deepfakes, Deep Harms

Regina Rini and Leah Cohen

The Indefensible Self-Defense Argument

Howard Hewitt

Overriding Adolescent Refusals of Treatment

Anthony Skelton, Lisa Forsberg, and Isra Black

Thomson’s Trolley Switch

Robert Shaver

Is Contrastive Consent Necessary for Secondary Permissibility?

Peter A. Graham

Portico