Is Contrastive Consent Necessary for Secondary Permissibility?

Peter A. Graham

doi:https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v25i3.2742

Volume 25, Number 3
September 2023

DISCUSSION

Is Contrastive Consent Necessary for Secondary Permissibility?

Volume 25, Number 3, September 2023, Pages 650–657

https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v25i3.2742

PDF

Abstract

Theron Pummer has argued that contrastive consent is necessary for the phenomenon of “secondary permissibility.” I argue that it is not, and I undermine the motivation for thinking that it is.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

|

Sulking into Sex: Blame, Coercion, and Consent

Sumeet Patwardhan

Utilitarianism, Altruism, and Consent

Christopher J. G. Meacham

The Case for Consent Pluralism

Jessica Keiser

Consent and Deception

Robert Jubb

What Knowledge Is Necessary for Virtue?

Olivia Bailey