Volume 6, Number 1
March 2012
ARTICLE

Gender Justice

Volume 6, Number 1, March 2012, Pages 1–25
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v6i1.60
PDFPDF

Abstract

I propose, defend and illustrate a principle of gender justice meant to capture the nature of a variety of injustices based on gender: A society is gender just only if the costs of a gender-neutral lifestyle are, all other things being equal, lower than, or at most equal to, the costs of gendered lifestyles. The principle is meant to account for the entire range of gender injustice: violence against women, economic and legal discrimination, domestic exploitation, the gendered division of labor and gendered socialization. The sense of “costs” employed is similarly wide. Costs can be material (such as financial, time or effort), psychological (such as self-respect, a good relationship with one’s body and emotions) and social (such as reputation, social acceptance and valuable social relationships). I defend the principle by appeal to the values at the core of liberal egalitarian justice: equality of access and the good of individual choice. I illustrate my case through a discussion of the injustice of a gendered division of labor. Some feminists doubt that liberal egalitarianism has the theoretical resources to recognize the unjust nature of the gendered division of labor. I argue that it does. If the principle advanced here is correct, then gender injustice is pervasive. At the same, it does not affect only women but also men. Liberal egalitarianism is capable of acknowledging this fact without denying that, overall, gender norms oppress women more than they oppress men: Arguably, women who wish to lead a gender-neutral lifestyle have to pay higher costs that men who wish to do the same.
Copyright © 2012 Anca Gheaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Three Kinds of Prioritarianism

Carlos Soto

Democracy and Social Equality

Ryan Cox

Children, Partiality, and Equality

David O'Brien

The Equivalence of Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism

Karin Enflo

Against Jeffrey Howard on Entrapment

Jonathan Stanhope

The Normative Significance of Conscience

Kyle Swan and Kevin Vallier

The Limits of Democratic Authority

C. L. Ten

Should Desert Replace Equality? Replies to Kagan

Michael Weber

First-Person Authority over Gender: Metaphysical, Ethical, and Epistemic, but Nonabsolute

Fiona Woollard

Freedom of Gender

Rach Cosker-Rowland

Educational Justice and the Value of Excellence

Tammy Harel Ben Shahar

Agnosticism and Pluralism About Justice

Adam Gjesdal

Portico