ARTICLE
Introducing Discord
Volume 30, Number 4, July 2025, Pages 548–571
PDFAbstract
In this article, I introduce and explain an underappreciated but pervasive phenomenon that I call discord. Discord helps to explain the source, dynamics, and resilience of many forms of interpersonal conflict. And it is a kind of misunderstanding into which philosophy offers a particularly privileged form of insight. By better understanding the nature of discord, we can better understand its inevitability, better navigate it, and better appreciate how it can amplify minor conflicts into more significant forms of strife. Discord, I show, is not just a theoretical possibility—it is inevitable. But discord is not just inevitable. It is also impactful. If you and I are in discord, then I do not respond to you in the ways that you think are appropriate. Worse, unrecognized discord has consequences of its own. And sometimes, discord itself persists precisely because it is not recognized. Fortunately, by giving you the concept of discord in this article, I equip you to be able to recognize (sometimes) when you are in discord. So this concept can be therapeutic because it can help you to avoid some of the bad effects of unrecognized discord and to escape discord that persists only because it is unrecognized.
Copyright © 2025 Mark Schroeder
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|
Crime, Public Health, and Inhumane Objectivity
Nadine Elzein
Personal Reactive Attitudes and Partial Responses to Others: A Partiality-Based Approach to Strawson’s Reactive Attitudes
Rosalind Chaplin
It’s a Fine Line Between Sadism and Horror
Scott Woodcock
Forgiveness and the Significance of Wrongs
Stefan Riedener
On Keeping Things in Proportion
Adam Lovett and Stefan Riedener
How Not to Defend Moral Blame
Andreas Leonhard Menges
This paper has not yet been cited.
