ARTICLE

Scope Restrictions, National Partiality, and War

Volume 20, Number 2, August 2021, Pages 144–167
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v20i2.1170

Abstract

Most of us believe that partiality applies in a broad range of relationships. One relationship on which there is much disagreement is co-nationality. Some writers argue that co-national partiality is not justified in certain cases, like killing in war, since killing in defense of co-nationals is intuitively impermissible in other contexts. I argue that this approach overlooks an important structural feature of partiality—namely, that its scope is sometimes restricted. In this essay, I show how some relationships that generate reasons of partiality are restricted in scope—that is, they generate reasons within particular contexts or with respect to particular goods. I then argue that co-national partiality is scope restricted. I then show how this fact helps proponents of co-national partiality overcome the aforementioned objection to its application in cases like war.
Copyright © 2021 Jeremy Davis
|

War, Legitimacy, and Democracy: Comments on Renzo

Thomas Christiano

Personal Reactive Attitudes and Partial Responses to Others: A Partiality-Based Approach to Strawson’s Reactive Attitudes

Rosalind Chaplin

Parental Partiality and Future Children

Thomas Douglas

“I Thought We Were Friends!” Friendship and the Normativity of Influence

Emma R. Duncan

The Value of Caring: A Reply to Maguire

Jörg Löschke

Reframing Epistemic Partiality: A Case for Acceptance

Laura K. Soter

The Weight of Authority in War: Comments on Renzo

David Estlund

Doxastic Partiality and the Puzzle of Enticing Right Action

Max Lewis

The Right to Mental Autonomy: Its Nature and Scope

William Ratoff

Forgiveness and Negative Partiality

Joshua Stuchlik Brandt

Combatants, Masculinity, and Just War Theory

Graham Parsons

Crying Havoc and (Re)claiming Rights: How the Liabilities of Revisionism and the Just War Tradition Alter the Moral Equality of Combatants

Marcus Hedahl