Paternalism and Exclusion

Kyle van Oosterum

doi:https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2741

Volume 26, Number 3
February 2024

ARTICLE

Paternalism and Exclusion

Volume 26, Number 3, February 2024, Pages 547–570

https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2741

PDF

Abstract

What makes paternalism wrong? I give an indirect answer to that question by challenging a recent trend in the literature that I call the exclusionary strategy. The exclusionary strategy aims to show how some feature of the paternalizee’s normative situation morally excludes acting for the paternalizee’s well-being. This moral exclusion consists either in ruling out the reasons for which a paternalizer may act or in changes to the right-making status of the reasons that (would) justify paternalistic intervention. I argue that both versions of the exclusionary strategy fail to explain the wrongness of paternalism and that they struggle to accommodate the mainstream view that paternalism is only pro tanto wrong. Their failure consists either in being implausibly strong expressions of antipaternalism or in struggling to spell out the scope of exclusion in an uncomplicated way. After discouraging this exclusionary strategy, I suggest we can capture what is appealing about it—as well as avoiding its pitfalls—by sketching a philosophical model in which we compare the weights of reasons for and against paternalistically interfering. To precisify this sketch, I introduce some conceptual tools from the literature on practical reasoning—in particular, the concept of modifiers—and suggest that these tools offer a better starting point for figuring out what makes paternalism (pro tanto) wrong.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

|

On the Normative Connection Between Paternalism and Rights

Stephanie Sheintul

Clarifying Parens Patriae

James G. Dwyer

Why Paternalists Must Endorse Epistocracy

Jason Brennan and Christopher Freiman

Overriding Adolescent Refusals of Treatment

Anthony Skelton, Lisa Forsberg, and Isra Black

Paternalism, Supported Decision-Making, and Expressive Respect

Linda Barclay

Territorial Exclusion: An Argument Against Closed Borders

Daniel Weltman