ARTICLE
Elizabeth Anscombe on Murder
Volume 27, Number 3, May 2024, Pages 552–576
Abstract
The topic of murder was among Elizabeth Anscombe’s central preoccupations. Drawing on both her published writings and newly available archival resources, this paper reconstructs Anscombe’s theory of murder. I show that Anscombe was concerned to deny the semantic thesis that ‘murder’ means ‘killing that is unjustified or impermissible’ and I show how her theory surmounts three challenges that seem to support the semantic thesis. In doing so, I discuss her views on responsibility, the significance of the distinction between intention and foresight, and the concept of a title to kill.
Copyright © 2024 Joshua Stuchlik Stuchlik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|
Contextualizing, Clarifying, and Defending the Doctrine of Double Effect
Melissa Moschella
Intelligibility and the Guise of the Good
Paul Boswell
Answerability Without Answers
Graham Hubbs
Practical Knowledge and Foreseen Side Effects
Niels van Miltenburg
The Principle of Double Effect in the Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and Elizabeth Anscombe
Joshua Stuchlik, Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie, 2025
Citation data courtesy of OpenAlex, an open scholarly database.