Volume 18, Number 1
July 2020
ARTICLE

False Exemplars: Admiration and the Ethics of Public Monuments

Volume 18, Number 1, July 2020, Pages 49–84
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v18i1.696
PDFPDF

Abstract

Recently, a new generation of activists has reinvigorated the debate over the symbolic public landscape of Western democracies, and in particular, public representations of historical figures whose immoral actions and beliefs are connected to the ongoing oppression of minority groups. In this paper, I consider three proposals for what we ought to do about such representations: remove them from public view, leave them unmodified, or re-contextualize them in some way. Drawing on the work of philosophers and social psychologists, I argue that there are a number of compelling moral reasons not to leave them unmodified. I argue that the decision to make these representations inaccessible to the public or recontextualize them for public consumption must be decided on a case-by-case basis, balancing several moral and pragmatic factors. Finally, I argue that in many cases, weak forms of recontextualization that do not involve altering their institutional context may be an insufficient remedy to the moral problems raised by these representations.
Copyright © 2020 Benjamin Cohen Rossi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Prospects for a Progressive Critique of Self-Sexualizing Rap Music: The Challenge of Oppressive Double Binds

Tareeq Jalloh

News Journalism and the Principles of Objectivity

Dhananjay Jagannathan and Clara Ence Morse

It’s a Fine Line Between Sadism and Horror

Scott Woodcock

Moral Outrage Porn

C. Thi Nguyen and Bekka Williams

Crime, Public Health, and Inhumane Objectivity

Nadine Elzein

Murderers on the Ballot Paper: Bad Apples, Moral Compromise, and the Epistemic Value of Public Deliberation in Representative Democracies

Richard Beadon Williams

The Ethics of Continuing Harm

Joseph Chapa

Are Savior Siblings a Special Case in Procreative Ethics?

Caleb Althorpe and Elizabeth Finneron-Burns

Ethics and the Question of What to Do

Olle Risberg

In Search of a Stable Consensus: Rawls’s Model of Public Reason and Its Critics

Cyril Hédoin

Discursive Integrity and the Principles of Responsible Public Debate

Matthew Chrisman

Religious Reasoning in the Liberal Public from the Second-Personal Perspective: A Defense of an Inclusivist Model of Public Reason Liberalism

Patrick Zoll

Portico