Volume 30, Number 5
September 2025
SYMPOSIUM

Soldiers and Moral Tragedy: Comments on Renzo

Volume 30, Number 5, September 2025, Pages 760–775
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v30i5.4142
PDFPDF

Abstract

This article examines Massimo Renzo’s important argument regarding the moral responsibility of soldiers fighting in unjust wars. Renzo proposes a middle position between, on the one hand, traditionalist views that absolve soldiers of moral culpability when following orders within the law of armed conflict and, on the other hand, revisionist positions that hold individual soldiers morally responsible for participation in unjust wars. Renzo argues that soldiers in legitimate states have a pro tanto duty to obey orders unless the presumption of obedience is clearly rebutted through independent moral reflection—what he terms “peeking” at underlying justifications. While acknowledging the theoretical sophistication of Renzo’s hybrid approach, this response identifies critical instabilities in his framework. The analysis reveals that in practice, soldiers of generally just states rarely have sufficient grounds to overcome the presumption of obedience, effectively collapsing Renzo’s position into a traditionalist absolution of individual combatant responsibility. Furthermore, the article argues that Renzo’s model creates a paradoxical situation in which soldiers can be simultaneously justified and unjustified in their actions. This paradox means that the account cannot fully address the tragic dimensions of political membership and the interpersonal nature of moral responsibility in warfare.
Copyright © 2025 Christopher Kutz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

The Weight of Authority in War: Comments on Renzo

David Estlund

Crying Havoc and (Re)claiming Rights: How the Liabilities of Revisionism and the Just War Tradition Alter the Moral Equality of Combatants

Marcus Hedahl

Must States Do It Themselves? A Rights-Based Theory of Delegating State Coercion

Vincent Chiao

Liberty, Equality, Authority

David Owens

Combatants, Masculinity, and Just War Theory

Graham Parsons

Against Deference to Authority

Travis Quigley

The Ethics of Continuing Harm

Joseph Chapa

Who Do You Speak For? And How? Online Abuse as Collective Subordinating Speech Acts

Michael Randall Barnes

The Limits of Instrumental Proceduralism

Jake Monaghan

Positive Rights: Two-Person Cases

David Alm

Disagreement, Unilateral Judgment, and Kant’s Argument for Rule by Law

Daniel Koltonski

Risking Civilian Lives to Avoid Harm to Cultural Heritage?

William Bülow

Portico