ARTICLE
The Limits of Instrumental Proceduralism
Volume 22, Number 1, May 2022, Pages 109–133
PDFAbstract
According to instrumental proceduralism, political power is justified when it is the output of a reliable procedure. In this paper, I examine how procedures are supposed to confer normative properties. Based on this assessment, I conclude that many proceduralists set the reliability bar too low. Next, I motivate two additional requirements for instrumental procedures. I introduce the notion of “predictable” procedural failure and argue that in order for a procedure to confer legitimacy or other normative properties on its output, it must not have failed predictably. Finally, I argue that even when procedures are highly reliable, it must not be the case that their failures fall disproportionately on certain people. The goal is to develop an instrumental proceduralism that is more sensitive to the failures of real institutions.
Copyright © 2022 Jake Monaghan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|
Must States Do It Themselves? A Rights-Based Theory of Delegating State Coercion
Vincent Chiao
Fake News and Democracy
Merten Reglitz
News Journalism and the Principles of Objectivity
Dhananjay Jagannathan and Clara Ence Morse
Liberty, Equality, Authority
David Owens
Politics and Foreign Donations
Andreas Bengtson and Dick Timmer
Political Forgetting
Alexander Bryan
Making Sense of Political Normativity
Mike Gadomski
The Weight of Authority in War: Comments on Renzo
David Estlund
Soldiers and Moral Tragedy: Comments on Renzo
Christopher Kutz
War, Legitimacy, and Democracy: Comments on Renzo
Thomas Christiano
Democracy, Disobedience, and Accountability
Henry Krahn
There Is No Institutional Duty to Vote
Jason Brennan and Christopher Freiman
