ARTICLE

What Can We Learn About Romantic Love from Harry Frankfurt’s Account of Love?

Volume 14, Number 3, February 2019, Pages 204–226
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v14i3.553

Abstract

Harry Frankfurt has a comprehensive and, at times, compelling, account of love, which are outlined in several of his works. However, he does not think that romantic love fits the ideal of love as it “includes a number of vividly distracting elements, which do not belong to the essential nature of love as a mode of disinterested concern.” In this paper, I argue that we can, nonetheless, learn some important things about romantic love from his account. Furthermore, I will suggest, conversely, that there is distinct value in romantic love, which derives from the nature of the relationship on which it is based. Frankfurt tries to take agape and reformulate it so that it can also account for love of particular people. While he succeeds, to some extent, in describing parental love, he fails to accurately describe romantic love and friendship, and, moreover, overlooks what is distinctly valuable about them. Although it was not his intention to describe romantic love, by failing to include features such as reciprocity in his account of love, Frankfurt leaves no room for a kind of love that is important and valuable to many people.
Copyright © 2019 Natasha McKeever
|

On an Analytic Definition of Love

Tyler J. VanderWeele

A Tripartite Theory of Love

Sam Shpall

Parental Partiality and Future Children

Thomas Douglas

The State’s Duty to Ensure Children Are Loved

Luara Ferracioli

No Disrespect—But That Account Does Not Explain What Is Morally Bad About Discrimination

Frej Klem Thomsen

Can Objectivists Account for Subjective Reasons?

Daniel Wodak

What Fictionalists Get Wrong About the Value of Winning

William J. Morgan

The Practice Account of Political Authority

Fabian Wendt

Can We Eat Animals Whose Existence Depends on It?

Karri Heikkinen

Can States Resist Migration Blackmail While Protecting Migrants?

Daniel Sharp

Beyond Ought-Implies-Can: Impersonal Obligatoriness Implies Historical Contingency

Peter B. M. Vranas

More on the Hybrid Account of Harm

Charlotte Franziska Unruh