ARTICLE

The State’s Duty to Ensure Children Are Loved

Volume 8, Number 2, October 2014, Pages 1–20
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v8i2.80

Abstract

Do children have a right to be loved? An affirmative answer faces two immediate challenges: (i) A child’s basic needs can be met without love, therefore a defense of such a right cannot appeal to the role of love in protecting children’s most basic needs, and (ii) since love is nonvoluntary, it seems that there cannot be a corresponding duty on the part of parents to love their child. In this essay, I defend an affirmative answer that overcomes both of these challenges. First, I argue that the right of children to be loved is grounded in the value of children leading meaningful lives. Second, I argue that the right of children to be loved gives rise to a duty on the part of the state to do all that it legitimately can to ensure that procreation and parenting follow from a truly voluntary decision on the part of its citizens.
Copyright © 2014 Luara Ferracioli
|

Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views?

Sabine Hohl

Children, Partiality, and Equality

David O'Brien

Parental Partiality and Future Children

Thomas Douglas

Unfinished Adults and Defective Children: On the Nature and Value of Childhood

Anca Gheaus

Clarifying Parens Patriae

James G. Dwyer

Attraction, Aversion, and Meaning in Life

Alisabeth Ayars

Are Savior Siblings a Special Case in Procreative Ethics?

Caleb Althorpe and Elizabeth Finneron-Burns

On an Analytic Definition of Love

Tyler J. VanderWeele

Fairness, Costs, and Procreative Justice

Gideon Elford

The Best Available Parent and Duties of Justice

Jordan David Thomas Walters

What Can We Learn About Romantic Love from Harry Frankfurt’s Account of Love?

Natasha McKeever

A Tripartite Theory of Love

Sam Shpall