Volume 30, Number 2
April 2025
ARTICLE

Democracy, Disobedience, and Accountability

Volume 30, Number 2, April 2025, Pages 155–178
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v30i2.4414
PDFPDF
MP3

Abstract

Many authors raise a democratic worry about the use of force and violence in protest. Protestors who rely on force or violence, the thought goes, do not attempt to win majority support for their position but instead attempt to directly bring about a political outcome by making the alternative more costly. Thus, the use of force and violence in protest may seem tantamount to forcing one’s views on others. This paper provides an alternative rationale for force and violence by presenting a theory of protest as a form of holding others accountable. When we hold others accountable interpersonally, we often use burdensome treatment to communicate with them about their conduct, but we do not try to force them to behave as we wish. In the same way, I argue, protestors may use force and violence to make a moral appeal to their audience without acting undemocratically.
Copyright © 2025 Henry Krahn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

War, Legitimacy, and Democracy: Comments on Renzo

Thomas Christiano

Refining the Argument from Democracy

Gabe Broughton

Civil Disobedience and Animal Rescue: A Reply to Milligan

Daniel Weltman

Democracy and Social Equality

Ryan Cox

Fake News and Democracy

Merten Reglitz

News Journalism and the Principles of Objectivity

Dhananjay Jagannathan and Clara Ence Morse

Politics and Foreign Donations

Andreas Bengtson and Dick Timmer

Political Forgetting

Alexander Bryan

Making Sense of Political Normativity

Mike Gadomski

There Is No Institutional Duty to Vote

Jason Brennan and Christopher Freiman

Voting, Representation, and Institutions: A Critique of Elliott’s Duty to Vote

Ben Saunders

How to Read a Riot

Ricky Mouser

Portico