Volume 20, Number 2
August 2021
ARTICLE

Kant and the Problem of Unequal Enforcement of Law

Volume 20, Number 2, August 2021, Pages 188–210
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v20i2.1148
PDFPDF

Abstract

According to Kant’s assurance argument, I am not bound in the state of nature to restrain myself from violating your rights, for I cannot be confident that you will similarly restrain yourself when it comes to my rights. Our status as equals requires that, if I am to be bound to respect your rights, I must have assurance that you will similarly respect mine, and this assurance is something that can only be provided by some entity whose coercive power over us is not only clearly dominant over us both but also directed at us equally. I argue that Kant’s assurance argument provides the basis for an important challenge to the American legal system’s claim to legitimate authority. This is, in one sense, a surprising result, since Kant is infamous for holding a particularly undemanding conception of legitimacy. I use the example of wage and hour laws: though the law define a worker’s wage rights, the legal system fails to enforce them against employers, thus leaving the worker without the assurance of the security of her rights that, on Kant’s assurance argument, she is entitled as a free and equal citizen.
Copyright © 2021 Daniel Koltonski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Disagreement, Unilateral Judgment, and Kant’s Argument for Rule by Law

Daniel Koltonski

Why (and How) States Protect Children

Nicholas Hadsell

Meriting Concern and Meriting Respect

Jon Garthoff

Is Kantian Ethics Self-Refuting? A Reply to Millgram

Joshua Glasgow

The Overweighted Integrity Problem: Conscience, Complicity, and Moral Standing

Kyle G. Fritz

Addiction, Responsibility, and a Sorites Problem

Jeesoo Nam

The Problem of Basic Equality: A Constructive Critique

Nikolas Kirby

Kant and the Balance of Moral Forces

Santiago Sanchez Borboa

Consumer Complicity and the Problem of Individual Causal Efficacy

Corey Katz

Don’t Be Cruel: Building the Case for Luck in the Law

Alexander Sarch

Law and Violence

Alexander Guerrero

The Goal Problem in the “Now What” Problem

Xinkan Zhao

Portico