Volume 31, Number 1
February 2026
ARTICLE

Why (and How) States Protect Children

Volume 31, Number 1, February 2026, Pages 81–106
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i1.4135
PDFPDF

Abstract

I give a broadly Kantian argument that the state is necessary for the existence of rightful families, where children are free of domination. Given this state-family relationship, I argue that various child welfare policies (e.g., licensing and monitoring) are in principle permissible for states to enact, though there are often strong prudential reasons against enacting them. So the main question we should ask when considering a child welfare policy is whether such prudential reasons exist, not whether such policies are the state’s business to enforce.
Copyright © 2026 Nicholas Hadsell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

The Kids Aren’t Alright: Expanding the Role of the State in Parenting

Connor K. Kianpour

The Naturalization of the Vulnerable: An International Responsibility with Demanding Implications

Davide Pala

Republican Freedom and Liberal Neutrality

Lars J. K. Moen

What Is the Point of Nondomination?

Devon Cass

The Best Available Parent and Duties of Justice

Jordan David Thomas Walters

Disagreement, Unilateral Judgment, and Kant’s Argument for Rule by Law

Daniel Koltonski

Kant and the Problem of Unequal Enforcement of Law

Daniel Koltonski

Meriting Concern and Meriting Respect

Jon Garthoff

Is Kantian Ethics Self-Refuting? A Reply to Millgram

Joshua Glasgow

Must States Do It Themselves? A Rights-Based Theory of Delegating State Coercion

Vincent Chiao

Can States Resist Migration Blackmail While Protecting Migrants?

Daniel Sharp

Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views?

Sabine Hohl

Portico