ARTICLE

Humean Externalism and the Argument from Depression

Volume 9, Number 2, September 2015, Pages 1–17
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v9i2.88

Abstract

Several prominent philosophers have argued that the fact that depressed agents sometimes make moral judgments without being appropriately motivated supports Humean externalism—the view that moral motivation must be explained in terms of desires that are distinct from or “external” to an agent’s motivationally inert moral judgments. This essay argues that such motivational failures do not, in fact, provide evidence for this view. I argue that, if the externalist argument from depression is to undermine a philosophically important version of internalism, it must make use of a general assumption about motivational states. However, at a reasonable level of abstraction, the needed assumption also implies that even desires could not be effective sources of motivation. For, just as depressed agents might sometimes lack motivation to act consistently with their moral judgments, they also sometimes lack motivation to pursue their desires. Moreover, the most plausible responses that Humeans can give to this general argument undermine the externalist case against internalism. Thus, there is a deep tension between the argument from depression for externalism and a fundamental Humean commitment.
Copyright © 2015 Steven Swartzer
|

Moral Fetishism and a Third Desire for What’s Right

Nathan Robert Howard

Depression and the Problem of Absent Desires

Ian Tully

The Humean Theory of Practical Irrationality

Neil Sinhababu

A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism

Matthew Bedke

Attraction, Aversion, and Meaning in Life

Alisabeth Ayars

How Temptation Works

John Schwenkler

Resolution and Resolve: Rationally Resisting Temptation

Abigail Bruxvoort

On an Analytic Definition of Love

Tyler J. VanderWeele

Are All Normative Judgments Desire-Like?

Alex Gregory

Reconsidering Resolutions

Alida Liberman

Checking the Neighborhood: A Reply to DiPaolo and and Behrends on Promotion

Nathaniel Sharadin

Illusions of Value

Pete Fossey