The Difference We Make: A Reply to Pinkert

Andrew T. Forcehimes; Luke Semrau

doi:https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v9i2.177

Volume 9, Number 2
September 2015

DISCUSSION

The Difference We Make: A Reply to Pinkert

and

Volume 9, Number 2, September 2015, Pages 1–7

https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v9i2.177

PDF

Abstract

Felix Pinkert has proposed a solution to the no-difference problem for act consequentialism. He argues that act consequentialism should be supplemented with a requirement that agents’ optimal acts be modally robust. We disagree.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

|

The Value of Caring: A Reply to Maguire

Jörg Löschke

What Is the Bad-Difference View of Disability?

Thomas Crawley

Chance, Epistemic Probability and Saving Lives: Reply to Bradley

Michael J. Almeida

Famine, Affluence, and Aquinas

Marshall Bierson and Tucker Sigourney

Are All Deceptions Manipulative or All Manipulations Deceptive?

Shlomo Cohen

The Importance of Roles in the Skill Analogy

Matt Dougherty

On Keeping Things in Proportion

Adam Lovett and Stefan Riedener

On Ex Ante Contractualism

Korbinian Rüger

Can We Intend the Past?

Oded Na'aman

The Unusual Logic of Hurka’s Recursive Account

Avram Hiller

Thomson’s Trolley Switch

Robert Shaver

Meriting Concern and Meriting Respect

Jon Garthoff