Volume 23, Number 2
November 2022
DISCUSSION

The Stability of the Just Society: Why Fixed Point Theorems Are Beside the Point

and
Volume 23, Number 2, November 2022, Pages 312–319
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v23i2.1971
PDFPDF

Abstract

Political theorists have invested significant effort in studying the attributes of desirable social-moral states of affairs. Schaefer (forthcoming) aims to show that “static political theory” of this kind rests on shaky foundations. His argument revolves around an application of an abstruse mathematical theorem—Kakutani’s fixed point theorem—to the social-moral domain. We show that Schaefer has misunderstood the implications of this theorem for political theory. Theorists who wish to study the attributes of social-moral states of affairs should carry on, secure in the knowledge that Kakutani’s theorem poses no threat to this enterprise.
Copyright © 2022 Sean Ingham and David Wiens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

What Relational Egalitarians Should (Not) Believe

Andreas Bengtson and Lauritz Aastrup Munch

Agnosticism and Pluralism About Justice

Adam Gjesdal

In Search of a Stable Consensus: Rawls’s Model of Public Reason and Its Critics

Cyril Hédoin

Children, Partiality, and Equality

David O'Brien

Constrained Fairness in Distribution

Daniel M. Hausman

Law and Violence

Alexander Guerrero

Freedom to Roam

Matthias Brinkmann

Do We Have Reasons to Obey the Law?

Edmund Tweedy Flanigan

Social Reform in a Complex World

Jacob Barrett

Judicial Corporal Punishment

Ole Martin Moen

Risk and the Unfairness of Some Being Better Off at the Expense of Others

Thomas Rowe

In or Out? Benevolent Absolutisms in The Law of Peoples

Robert Huseby

Portico