Volume 15, Number 2
June 2019
ARTICLE

Not Duties but Needs: Rethinking Refugeehood

Volume 15, Number 2, June 2019, Pages 91–120
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v15i2.483
PDFPDF

Abstract

In the scholarly debate, refugeehood is often understood to arise from a special need for basic protection, i.e., for protection of basic needs and rights. However, the main definitions of refugeehood shift to duties when aiming to develop this view. Either, refugees are defined as all those individuals who can receive basic protection from the international community, and thus arguably ought to be protected, or refugees are defined as all those to whom a special form of protection, namely protection by admission is owed. The paper argues that either definition is incompatible with a commonsense desideratum on consistent and plausible criteria for refugeehood, since these definitions imply that refugeehood depends partly on the capacities of protecting states and on the needs of third parties. Instead, refugeehood is defined by the need for basic protection and by flight aiming to remedy this condition.
Copyright © 2019 Susanne Mantel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Institutional Conservatism and the Right to Exclude

Hallvard Sandven

Rossian Minimalism

Ned Markosian

Slack Taking and Burden Dumping: Fair Cost Sharing in Duties to Rescue

Aaron Finley

The Best Available Parent and Duties of Justice

Jordan David Thomas Walters

Rethinking Demandingness: Why Satisficing Consequentialism and Scalar Consequentialism Are Not Less Demanding Than Maximizing Consequentialism

Spencer Case

Portico