Is Liberalism Committed to Its Own Demise?

Hrishikesh Joshi

doi:https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v13i3.367

Volume 13, Number 3
July 2018

DISCUSSION

Is Liberalism Committed to Its Own Demise?

Volume 13, Number 3, July 2018, Pages 259–267

https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v13i3.367

PDF

Abstract

Are immigration restrictions compatible with liberalism? Recently, Freiman and Hidalgo (2016) have argued that immigration restrictions conflict with the core commitments of liberalism. A society with immigration restrictions in place may well be optimal in some desired respects, but it is not liberal, they argue. So if you care about liberalism more deeply than you care about immigration restrictions, you should give up on restrictionism. You can’t hold on to both. I argue here that many restrictions on contractual, economic, and associational liberties seem to be justified by considerations other than liberty—thus the (undischarged) task for Freiman and Hidalgo is to tell us why such restrictions are justified but immigration restrictions are not. Moreover, even if this worry can be addressed, I argue, liberalism is not committed to its own demise in scenarios where there exist large enough numbers of would-be immigrants who accept and endorse illiberal norms in a way that is sufficiently resistant to change. Such a commitment requires thinking of border coercion as violating an absolute deontological constraint. This, I contend, is implausible.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

|

Liberalism or Immigration Restrictions, But Not Both

Christopher Freiman and Javier Hidalgo

Immigration Policy and Identification Across Borders

Matthew Lindauer

Allies Against Oppression: Intersectional Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and Rawlsian Liberalism

Marcus Arvan

News Journalism and the Principles of Objectivity

Dhananjay Jagannathan and Clara Ence Morse

Politics and Foreign Donations

Andreas Bengtson and Dick Timmer

Freedom of Gender

Rach Cosker-Rowland

Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views?

Sabine Hohl

Political Obligation and Political Recognition

Dan Khokhar

Enclaves for the Excluded: A Pessimistic Defense

Jamie Draper

Should All Freedom Be Basic?

Seena Eftekhari

Three Kinds of Prioritarianism

Carlos Soto

Republican Freedom and Liberal Neutrality

Lars J. K. Moen