Volume 12, Number 3
December 2017
ARTICLE

Immigration Policy and Identification Across Borders

Volume 12, Number 3, December 2017, Pages 280–303
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i3.248
PDFPDF

Abstract

According to the traditional state sovereignty view in the ethics of immigration literature, societies have a great deal of latitude in determining and implementing their immigration policies. This view is typically defended by appealing to the rights of members of societies, for instance to political self-determination. Opponents of the view have often criticized its partiality to members, arguing that nonmembers can also make stringent demands on societies to be admitted and given the same treatment in matters of immigration policy as other nonmembers. In this paper, I take a different approach to responding to the state sovereignty view. I argue that even if we grant the premise that the rights of members generally trump the rights of nonmembers in matters of immigration policy, societies are greatly constrained in setting their immigration policies by considerations of domestic justice. The considerations that I focus on involve relationships between members and nonmembers that hold due to a shared quality or set of qualities on the basis of which members identify with nonmembers. The argument appeals to premises and principles that defenders of the state sovereignty view are committed to but concludes that this view cannot serve as a satisfactory framework for the normative assessment of immigration policies.
Copyright © 2017 Matthew Lindauer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Liberalism or Immigration Restrictions, But Not Both

Christopher Freiman and Javier Hidalgo

Is Liberalism Committed to Its Own Demise?

Hrishikesh Joshi

Territorial Exclusion: An Argument Against Closed Borders

Daniel Weltman

Immigration Restrictions and the Right to Avoid Unwanted Obligations

Javier Hidalgo

Freedom of Gender

Rach Cosker-Rowland

Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views?

Sabine Hohl

Political Obligation and Political Recognition

Dan Khokhar

Enclaves for the Excluded: A Pessimistic Defense

Jamie Draper

Should All Freedom Be Basic?

Seena Eftekhari

Adding Insult to Injury: Is Censorship Insulting?

Sebastien Bishop

How to Read a Riot

Ricky Mouser

Republican Freedom and Liberal Neutrality

Lars J. K. Moen

Portico