Volume 25, Number 1
July 2023
ARTICLE

What Is the Point of Nondomination?

Volume 25, Number 1, July 2023, Pages 80–104
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v25i1.1721
PDFPDF

Abstract

This paper examines the following distinctive republican claims: (1) goodwill and virtuous self-restraint are insufficient to realize freedom; and (2) suitable law is constitutive of freedom. In the contemporary literature, these claims are commonly defended in connection with the conception of freedom as nondomination. This account, however, is often rejected on the grounds that freedom as nondomination is moralized and impossible to realize. In response, I propose that the point of protecting people from domination is better understood not as realizing freedom, but instead as giving persons a civic status as equals. Giving persons a civic status as equals, I claim, realizes an important form of social or “relational” equality, and I distinguish this aim from giving persons a “status as nondominated,” as some republicans require. I argue that this account vindicates alternative claims about the insufficiency of goodwill and constitutive importance of suitable law—understood in terms of equality rather than freedom—while avoiding the moralization and impossibility objections. I conclude by suggesting some further advantages of the proposed account versus the standard republican view.
Copyright © 2023 Devon Cass
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

The Naturalization of the Vulnerable: An International Responsibility with Demanding Implications

Davide Pala

Reparations, Relational Equality, and Causation

Felix Lambrecht

Why (and How) States Protect Children

Nicholas Hadsell

Enclaves for the Excluded: A Pessimistic Defense

Jamie Draper

Republican Freedom and Liberal Neutrality

Lars J. K. Moen

Democracy and Social Equality

Ryan Cox

The Point of Blaming ai Systems

Hannah Altehenger and Leonhard Menges

The Stability of the Just Society: Why Fixed Point Theorems Are Beside the Point

Sean Ingham and David Wiens

“Freedom and Resentment” and Consequentialism: Why “Strawson’s Point” is Not Strawson’s Point

Dale E. Miller

Portico