ARTICLE

The Point of Blaming ai Systems

and
Volume 27, Number 2, April 2024, Pages 287–314
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v27i2.3060

Abstract

As Christian List has recently argued, the increasing arrival of powerful ai systems that operate autonomously in high-stakes contexts creates a need for “future-proofing” our regulatory frameworks, i.e., for reassessing them in the face of these developments. One core part of our regulatory frameworks that dominates our everyday moral interactions is blame. Therefore, “future-proofing” our extant regulatory frameworks in the face of the increasing arrival of powerful ai systems requires, among other things, that we ask whether it makes sense to extend our blaming practices to these systems. In this paper, we argue for the admittedly surprising thesis that this question should be answered in the affirmative: contrary to what one might initially think, it can make a lot of sense to blame ai systems since, as we furthermore argue, many of the important functions that are fulfilled by blaming humans can also be served by blaming ai systems. The paper concludes that this result gives us a good pro tanto reason to extend our blame practices to ai systems.
Copyright © 2024 Hannah Altehenger and Leonhard Menges
|

Inclusive Blameworthiness and the Wrongfulness of Causing Harm

Evan Tiffany

The Comparative Nonarbitrariness Norm of Blame

Daniel Telech and Hannah Tierney

Basically Deserved Blame and Its Value

Michael McKenna

Responsibility and the Social Dimension of Addiction

Keyao Yang

Enclaves for the Excluded: A Pessimistic Defense

Jamie Draper

Crime, Public Health, and Inhumane Objectivity

Nadine Elzein

The Overweighted Integrity Problem: Conscience, Complicity, and Moral Standing

Kyle G. Fritz

Sulking into Sex: Blame, Coercion, and Consent

Sumeet Patwardhan

Letting Animals Off the Hook

Nicolas Delon

Dismissing Blame

Justin Snedegar

Attributionist Group Agent Responsibility

Adam Piovarchy

Is Morality Open to the Free Will Skeptic?

Stephen Morris