Volume 9, Number 1
May 2015
DISCUSSION

Expressivism Worth the Name: A Reply to Teemu Toppinen

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2015, Pages 1–7
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v9i1.168
PDFPDF

Abstract

I respond to an interesting objection to my 2014 argument against hermeneutic expressivism. I argue that even though Toppinen has identified an intriguing route for the expressivist to tread, the plausible developments of it would not fall to my argument anyways—as they do not make direct use of the parity thesis which claims that expression works the same way in the case of conative and cognitive attitudes. I close by sketching a few other problems plaguing such views.
Copyright © 2015 Jack Woods
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Non-Cognitivism and the Problem of Moral-Based Epistemic Reasons: A Sympathetic Reply to Cian Dorr

Joseph Long

Reclamation and the Epistemic Objectionability of Slurs

Pasi Valtonen

Against Being For

James L. D. Brown

Sorting Out Solutions to the Now-What Problem

François Jaquet

Is Gibbard a Realist?

Laura Schroeter and François Schroeter

Expressivism and Moore’s Paradox: A Reply to Woods

Teemu Toppinen

What Is (Fundamentally or Per Se) Wrong with Colonialism: A Reply to Agrawal and Buchanan

Daniel Weltman

Moral Worth in Gettier Cases

Neil Sinhababu

Not Living My Best Life: A Reply to Masny

Guy Fletcher

Privileged Citizens and the Right to Riot: A Reply to Pasternak

Thomas Carnes

The Case for Voting to Change the Outcomes Is Weaker Than It May Seem: A Reply to Zach Barnett

Amir Liron and David Enoch

Civil Disobedience and Animal Rescue: A Reply to Milligan

Daniel Weltman

Portico