Volume 26, Number 3
February 2024
ARTICLE

Maxim and Principle Contractualism

Volume 26, Number 3, February 2024, Pages 571–600
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2719
PDFPDF

Abstract

I argue that, in order to address the ideal world problem while remaining faithful to our concept of morality, Contractualists should no longer determine which actions I must perform by seeing whether they accord with certain principles for the general regulation of behavior. Instead, I argue, Contractualists should determine whether it is right or wrong for me to perform an action by evaluating any maxim that might be reflected by my action. I call the resulting view “Maxim Contractualism.” It states that an agent’s action is morally required just in case any maxim that he might adopt that involves not performing that action is one that someone could reasonably reject. Finally, I argue that, although Act Contractualism also provides us with the materials to solve the Ideal World Problem, it is a worse solution because it cannot account for the fact that, sometimes, what would happen if I performed an action over time is relevant to whether I am permitted to perform that action right here, right now.
Copyright © 2024 Aaron Salomon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Why Contractualism Cannot Accept Equal Treatment for Equal Statistical Loss

Jay Zemeska

Contractualism and Compensation for Risk Impositions

Richard Endörfer

Contractualism, Complaints, and Risk

Bastian Steuwer

Three Kinds of Prioritarianism

Carlos Soto

The Challenge for Coronavirus Vaccine Testing

Bastian Steuwer

Nonideal Justice, Fairness, and Affirmative Action

Matthew Adams

The Normative Significance of Conscience

Kyle Swan and Kevin Vallier

A Unified Moral Terrain?

Stephen Everson

Leaving Principle Contractualism Behind? A Response to Salomon

Valentin Salein

Navigating Nonidentity: Scanlonian Contractualism and Types of Persons

D. Valeska Martin

On Ex Ante Contractualism

Korbinian Rüger

In Defense of the Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle

Simon Rippon

Portico