Volume 20, Number 3
November 2021
ARTICLE

Nonideal Justice, Fairness, and Affirmative Action

Volume 20, Number 3, November 2021, Pages 310–341
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v20i3.1630
PDFPDF

Abstract

I defend affirmative action on the ground that it increases certain people’s ability to exercise their basic liberties, rather than because it rectifies injustice in the narrow context of educational admission procedures. I present this justification using a Rawlsian contractualist framework to forge a “nonideal principle of justice.” Drawing on social science, I argue that this principle supports affirmative-action policies like those in the contemporary United States, and blocks the objection that such policies are unfair. In closing, I show how my account can be used to refine some features of contemporary affirmative-action policies, and I reflect more generally on the value of nonideal principles of justice for tackling exigent topics.
Copyright © 2021 Matthew Adams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Fairness, Costs, and Procreative Justice

Gideon Elford

Nonideal Theory as Ideology

Jordan David Thomas Walters

Fairness and Chance in Diachronic Lotteries: A Response to Vong

Marie Feldblyum Le Blevennec

Why Contractualism Cannot Accept Equal Treatment for Equal Statistical Loss

Jay Zemeska

Contractualism and Compensation for Risk Impositions

Richard Endörfer

Three Kinds of Prioritarianism

Carlos Soto

The Challenge for Coronavirus Vaccine Testing

Bastian Steuwer

Maxim and Principle Contractualism

Aaron Salomon

Allies Against Oppression: Intersectional Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and Rawlsian Liberalism

Marcus Arvan

Contractualism, Complaints, and Risk

Bastian Steuwer

Social Reform in a Complex World

Jacob Barrett

The Normative Significance of Conscience

Kyle Swan and Kevin Vallier

Portico