Volume 30, Number 1
March 2025
ARTICLE

Contractualism and Compensation for Risk Impositions

Volume 30, Number 1, March 2025, Pages 29–53
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v30i1.3718
PDFPDF

Abstract

The world we inhabit is full of risks, many of which come about due to socially beneficial activities we undertake. Compensation is often invoked as a necessary element in the justification for why we are permitted to engage in these activities despite the risks they pose to ourselves and others. In this article, I discuss how Scanlonian contractualists ought to think about compensating the victims of socially beneficial yet risky practices that we engage with every day. I consider how two prominent risk-sensitive accounts of contractualism, ex ante contractualism and ex post contractualism, ought to take compensation into account. My main point is that ex ante contractualism fails to deliver the conclusion that victims of risky social practices ought to receive a reasonable amount of compensation for the harm they eventually suffer. Roughly, this is so because ex ante contractualism cannot explain why these victims ought to prefer compensation for harm rather than mere compensation for risk. I call this the callousness objection to ex ante contractualism. I argue that the callousness objection provides us with a strong reason to favor ex post over ex ante contractualism. Furthermore, I expand on the implications that the possibility of compensation has regarding the demandingness of ex post contractualism.
Copyright © 2025 Richard Endörfer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Why Contractualism Cannot Accept Equal Treatment for Equal Statistical Loss

Jay Zemeska

The Challenge for Coronavirus Vaccine Testing

Bastian Steuwer

Contractualism, Complaints, and Risk

Bastian Steuwer

Rights Infringement, Compensation, and Luck Egalitarianism

Jesse Spafford

Leaving Principle Contractualism Behind? A Response to Salomon

Valentin Salein

Probability, Normalcy, and the Right Against Risk Imposition

Martin Smith

Maxim and Principle Contractualism

Aaron Salomon

Touching the Good: Special Relationships as Contact with Value

Adam Lovett and Stefan Riedener

Three Kinds of Prioritarianism

Carlos Soto

The Red Mist

Maxime Lepoutre

Agency, Stability, and Permeability in “Games”

Elisabeth Camp

How We Can Make Sense of Control-Based Intuitions for Limited Access Conceptions of the Right to Privacy

Björn Lundgren

Portico