Volume 5, Number 1
February 2011
ARTICLE

Is a Feminist Political Liberalism Possible?

and
Volume 5, Number 1, February 2011, Pages 1–22
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v5i1.48
PDFPDF

Abstract

Is a feminist political liberalism possible? Political liberalism’s regard for a wide range of comprehensive doctrines as reasonable makes some feminists skeptical of its ability to address sex inequality. Indeed, some feminists claim that political liberalism maintains its position as a political liberalism at the expense of securing substantive equality for women. We claim that political liberalism’s core commitments actually restrict all reasonable political conceptions of justice to those that secure genuine substantive equality for all, including women and other marginalized groups. In particular, we argue that political liberalism’s criterion of reciprocity limits reasonable political conceptions of justice to those that eliminate social conditions of domination and subordination relevant to reasonable democratic deliberation among equal citizens and that the criterion of reciprocity requires the social conditions necessary for recognition respect among persons as equal citizens. As a result, we maintain that the criterion of reciprocity limits reasonable political conceptions of justice to those that provide genuine equality for women along various dimensions of social life central to equal citizenship.
Copyright © 2011 Christie Hartley and Lori Watson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Beyond a Strictly Political Liberalism? Critical Response to Abbey

Akira Inoue

Reply to Critics of The Constitution of Equality

Thomas Christiano

Judicial Review and Democratic Authority: Absolute vs. Balancing Conceptions

Corey Brettschneider

“Simply In Virtue of Being Human”: The Whos and Whys of Human Rights

John Gardner

Weakness of Political Will

Camila Hernandez Flowerman

Allies Against Oppression: Intersectional Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and Rawlsian Liberalism

Marcus Arvan

In Defense of Discretionary Association Theories of Political Legitimacy: Reply to Buchanan

Marcus Arvan

Speechlessness and Linguistic Reciprocity in Arendt

Magnus Ferguson

The Fair Share Theory of Conventional Normativity

Adam Lovett

Rights Infringement, Compensation, and Luck Egalitarianism

Jesse Spafford

In Defense of Claim Rights

Michael Da Silva

Probability, Normalcy, and the Right Against Risk Imposition

Martin Smith

Portico