Volume 31, Number 3
May 2026
ARTICLE

Speechlessness and Linguistic Reciprocity in Arendt

Volume 31, Number 3, May 2026, Pages 390–418
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i3.4435
PDFPDF

Abstract

This article argues that in certain contexts, unreciprocated speech can be an important form of care for persons who would otherwise find it difficult to retain their place in shared worlds of linguistic meaning, such as those who lose capacities for linguistic expression due to illness. Philosophers and political theorists often underscore the importance of reciprocated speech for sharing in a human world. Hannah Arendt makes this point especially forcefully in The Origins of Totalitarianism and The Human Condition, in which she suggests that “speechless” persons are excluded from the linguistic “web of relationships.” I reconstruct several of Arendt’s analyses of speech and speechlessness and argue that they are prima facie exclusionary to nonspeaking persons. After responding to several objections against attributing this exclusionary position to Arendt, I identify resources in Arendt’s own writing, as well as that of Iris Marion Young and Aristotle, for theorizing unreciprocated speech as a way of offering listeners footholds in the linguistic spheres of meaning around them.
Copyright © 2026 Magnus Ferguson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Challenges for the Inability Theory of Disability

Stephanie Elsen

Expecting Equality: How Prenatal Screening Policy Harms People with Disabilities

Athmeya Jayaram

What Is the Bad-Difference View of Disability?

Thomas Crawley

Disability as Inability

Alex Gregory

Well-Being, Opportunity, and Selecting for Disability

S. Andrew Schroeder

Is It Bad to Be Disabled? Adjudicating Between the Mere-Difference and the Bad-Difference Views of Disability

Vuko Andrić and Joachim Wündisch

Is a Feminist Political Liberalism Possible?

Christie Hartley and Lori Watson

What Knowledge Is Necessary for Virtue?

Olivia Bailey

Reciprocity and Liberal Legitimacy: Critical Comment on May

Blain Neufeld

Contractualism, Reciprocity, and Compensation

David Alm

Portico