Volume 24, Number 1
February 2023
ARTICLE

The Red Mist

Volume 24, Number 1, February 2023, Pages 36–57
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v24i1.2145
PDFPDF

Abstract

An influential critique of anger holds that anger comes at an important epistemic cost. In particular, feeling angry typically makes risk less visible to us. This is anger’s “red mist.” These epistemic costs, critics suggest, arguably outweigh the epistemic benefits commonly ascribed to anger. This essay argues that the epistemic critique of anger is importantly misleading. This is not because it underestimates anger’s epistemic benefits, but rather because it overlooks the fact that anger’s red mist performs a crucial moral function. By concealing risk, the red mist helps protect the dignity and self-respect of those who live under severe and unchosen risk. This function is vitally important in non-ideal circumstances, where many are unjustly subjected to dignity-impairing risk. And it is irreplaceable, in that it cannot readily be performed by other political emotions, such as hope. Beyond providing a novel defense of anger, this argument has a broader upshot. Anger’s red mist reveals that ignorance is not always problematic in politics. Accordingly, it should not be treated—as has standardly been the case—as an unmitigated political evil. In the first instance, our efforts are better spent ascertaining when ignorance is a problem, and when, instead, it performs a felicitous function.
Copyright © 2023 Maxime Lepoutre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Gratitude’s Fitting Growth

Daniel Telech

Gaslighting and Epistemic Competence

Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini

Delegitimizing Transphobic Views in Academia

Logan Mitchell

Contractualism and Compensation for Risk Impositions

Richard Endörfer

The Challenge for Coronavirus Vaccine Testing

Bastian Steuwer

Letting Animals Off the Hook

Nicolas Delon

Probability, Normalcy, and the Right Against Risk Imposition

Martin Smith

How to Read a Riot

Ricky Mouser

Alienation and the Metaphysics of Normativity: On the Quality of Our Relations with the World

Jack Samuel

Backsliding and Bad Faith: Aspiration, Disavowal, and (Residual) Practical Identities

Justin F. White

Betrayed Expectations: Misdirected Anger and the Preservation of Ideology

Barrett Emerick and Audrey Yap

Games Unlike Life: A Reply to Camp and Millgram

C. Thi Nguyen

Portico