ARTICLE

Ethical Veganism and Free Riding

and
Volume 24, Number 2, March 2023, Pages 184–212
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v24i2.2334

Abstract

The animal agriculture industry causes animals a tremendous amount of pain and suffering. Many ethical vegans argue that we therefore have an obligation to abstain from animal products in order to reduce this suffering. But this argument faces a challenge: thanks to the size and structure of the animal agriculture industry, any individual’s dietary choices are overwhelmingly unlikely to make a difference. In this paper, we criticize common replies to this challenge and develop an alternative argument for ethical veganism. Specifically, we argue that individuals should abstain from animal products because vegans, as a group, successfully reduce animal suffering, and individuals are obligated to participate in, rather than free ride on, this collective endeavor. Or, at the very least, individuals have strong reasons to purchase fewer inhumanely raised animal products—even if they are not obligated to go vegan per se.
Copyright © 2023 Jacob Barrett and Sarah Zoe Raskoff
|

Kantian Free Riding

Jan Willem Wieland

How to Be Morally Responsible for Another’s Free Intentional Action

Olle Blomberg

The Overweighted Integrity Problem: Conscience, Complicity, and Moral Standing

Kyle G. Fritz

First-Person Authority over Gender: Metaphysical, Ethical, and Epistemic, but Nonabsolute

Fiona Woollard

Is Morality Open to the Free Will Skeptic?

Stephen Morris

Should Libertarians Reject the Free Market? On Olsaretti’s Positive Answer

Peter Bornschein

Humility and Ethical Development

Cathy Mason

Ethical Reductionism

Neil Sinhababu

Concept Formation in Ethical Theories: Dealing with Polar Predicates

Sebastian Lutz