Volume 6, Number 1
March 2012
DISCUSSION

Finlay and Schroeder on Promoting a Desire

and
Volume 6, Number 1, March 2012, Pages 1–7
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v6i1.146
PDFPDF

Abstract

This paper argues against two prominent accounts of what it is to “promote a desire” found in the work of Stephen Finlay and Mark Schroeder.
Copyright © 2012 Jeff Behrends and Joshua DiPaolo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Checking the Neighborhood: A Reply to DiPaolo and and Behrends on Promotion

Nathaniel Sharadin

Reducing Reasons

Matthew Silverstein

Reason to Promotion Inferences

Joshua DiPaolo and Jeff Behrends

Are All Normative Judgments Desire-Like?

Alex Gregory

On Promoting the Dead Certain: A Reply to Behrends, DiPaolo and Sharadin

Stefan Fischer

The Abductive Case for Humeanism Over Quasi-Perceptual Theories of Desire

Derek Baker

Desire Satisfactionism and the Problem of Irrelevant Desires

Mark Lukas

A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism

Matthew Bedke

Rationality and Responding to Normative Reasons

Mohamad Hadi Safaei

Attraction, Aversion, and Meaning in Life

Alisabeth Ayars

On Giving Yourself a Sign

Justin Dealy

How Temptation Works

John Schwenkler

Portico