ARTICLE

Reducing Reasons

Volume 10, Number 1, April 2016, Pages 1–23
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v10i1.95

Abstract

Reasons are considerations that figure in sound reasoning. This is considered by many philosophers to be little more than a platitude. I argue that it actually has surprising and far-reaching metanormative implications. The view that reasons are linked to sound reasoning seems platitudinous only because we tend to assume that soundness is a normative property, in which case the view merely relates one normative phenomenon (reasons) to another (soundness). I argue that soundness is also a descriptive phenomenon, one we can pick out with purely descriptive terms, and that the connection between normative reasons and sound reasoning therefore provides the basis for a reductive account of reasons. Like all proposed reductions, this one must confront some version of G. E. Moore’s open question argument. I argue that a reductive view rooted in the idea that reasons figure in sound reasoning is well-equipped to meet the open question challenge head on.
Copyright © 2016 Matthew Silverstein
|

Moral Fixed Points and Conceptual Deficiency: Reply to Ingram

Christos Kyriacou

The Normative Significance of Self

Dale Dorsey

Finlay and Schroeder on Promoting a Desire

Jeff Behrends and Joshua DiPaolo

Cudworth and Normative Explanations

Mark Schroeder

Rationality and Responding to Normative Reasons

Mohamad Hadi Safaei

The Case for Stance-Dependent Reasons

David Sobel

Can There Be Government House Reasons for Action?

Hille Paakkunainen

Against Scanlon’s Theory of the Strength of Practical Reasons

Eric Sampson

Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons

Rach Cosker-Rowland

On the Metaphysics of Relation-Response Properties; or, Why You Shouldn’t Collapse Response-Dependent Properties into Their Grounds

Spencer M. Smith

On Giving Yourself a Sign

Justin Dealy

Alienation and the Metaphysics of Normativity: On the Quality of Our Relations with the World

Jack Samuel