ARTICLE

Is It Bad to Be Disabled? Adjudicating Between the Mere-Difference and the Bad-Difference Views of Disability

and
Volume 9, Number 3, December 2015, Pages 1–17
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v9i3.93

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of disability on wellbeing and presents arguments against the mere-difference view of disability. According to the mere-difference view, disability does not by itself make disabled people worse off on balance. Rather, if disability has a negative impact on wellbeing overall, this is only so because society is not treating disabled people the way it ought to treat them. In objection to the mere-difference view, it has been argued, roughly, that the view licenses the permissibility of causing disability and the impermissibility of causing nondisability. In her recent article, “Valuing Disability, Causing Disability,” Elizabeth Barnes attempts to show that this causation-based objection does not succeed. We disagree and argue why. We begin by explaining that in order to defeat the causation-based objection it does not suffice to show that it is not always true that the mere-difference view licenses causing disability. Rather, license in some cases, in a way that undermines the plausibility of the mere-difference view, would be sufficient for the causation-based objection to succeed. Then our discussion turns to an important challenge for proponents of the causation-based objection: Some defenders of the mere-difference view are prepared to simply accept the counterintuitive implications of their position. A dialogue with such proponents of the mere-difference view requires arguments with independent traction. We present several such arguments to the effect that the mere-difference view needs to be significantly reduced in scope—and may turn out to be false altogether.
Copyright © 2015 Vuko Andrić and Joachim Wündisch
|

What Is the Bad-Difference View of Disability?

Thomas Crawley

Challenges for the Inability Theory of Disability

Stephanie Elsen

Disability as Inability

Alex Gregory

Well-Being, Opportunity, and Selecting for Disability

S. Andrew Schroeder

Speechlessness and Linguistic Reciprocity in Arendt

Magnus Ferguson

Expecting Equality: How Prenatal Screening Policy Harms People with Disabilities

Athmeya Jayaram

Delegitimizing Transphobic Views in Academia

Logan Mitchell

Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views?

Sabine Hohl

Murderers on the Ballot Paper: Bad Apples, Moral Compromise, and the Epistemic Value of Public Deliberation in Representative Democracies

Richard Beadon Williams

Backsliding and Bad Faith: Aspiration, Disavowal, and (Residual) Practical Identities

Justin F. White

It’s a Fine Line Between Sadism and Horror

Scott Woodcock

No Disrespect—But That Account Does Not Explain What Is Morally Bad About Discrimination

Frej Klem Thomsen