Volume 24, Number 2
March 2023
ARTICLE

The Purpose and Limits of Electoral Accountability

Volume 24, Number 2, March 2023, Pages 258–290
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v24i2.2241
PDFPDF

Abstract

The standard theory of electoral accountability treats the electorate as an appraiser of government performance on a range of complex issues, which re-elects or de-elects depending on its evaluation of that performance. This paper draws from studies on voter knowledge and behaviour to present a dilemma for the standard theory: either voters do not know how well their rulers have performed, or if they do, they do not base their votes on that knowledge. It is shown that, on either horn of the dilemma, the standard account of electoral accountability fails, and that attempts to deflate the dilemma through heuristic and aggregative approaches to voter knowledge, or proposals for alternative systems of government, are also inadequate. The paper then sets out and defends an alternative conception of electoral accountability, which holds that electoral accountability is not about micro-assessing a government’s actions. Rather, it is about preventing political rulers from committing or allowing substantial harms to come upon those they govern. This alternative conception is compatible with a realistic view of voter knowledge and behavior, but nonetheless makes electoral accountability an essential component of a well-functioning democratic system.
Copyright © 2023 Finlay Malcolm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Agnosticism and Pluralism About Justice

Adam Gjesdal

Making Sense of Political Normativity

Mike Gadomski

Should All Freedom Be Basic?

Seena Eftekhari

In Search of a Stable Consensus: Rawls’s Model of Public Reason and Its Critics

Cyril Hédoin

Does Convergence Liberalism Risk Anarchy?

Marcus Schultz-Bergin

In or Out? Benevolent Absolutisms in The Law of Peoples

Robert Huseby

Reciprocity and Liberal Legitimacy: Critical Comment on May

Blain Neufeld

In Defense of Discretionary Association Theories of Political Legitimacy: Reply to Buchanan

Marcus Arvan

Beyond a Strictly Political Liberalism? Critical Response to Abbey

Akira Inoue

Democracy, Disobedience, and Accountability

Henry Krahn

The Limits of Instrumental Proceduralism

Jake Monaghan

Blaming for Unreasonableness: Accountability Without Ill Will

Alisabeth Ayars

Portico