Tuck on the Rationality of Voting: A Critical Note

DISCUSSION

Volume 3, Number 3, October 2009, Pages 1–7

Abstract

This paper argues that Richard Tuck, in his book Free Riding, fails to show it is rational to vote except in unusual cases.

|

Voting, Representation, and Institutions: A Critique of Elliott’s Duty to Vote

Ben Saunders

People Do Not Have a Duty to Avoid Voting Badly: Reply to Brennan

Marcus Arvan

There Is No Institutional Duty to Vote

Jason Brennan and Christopher Freiman

Kantian Free Riding

Jan Willem Wieland

Voter Motivation

Adam Lovett

Distributing Collective Obligation

Sean Aas

A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism

Matthew Bedke

Rationality and Responding to Normative Reasons

Mohamad Hadi Safaei

Rationality, Shmationality: Even Newer Shmagency Worries

Olof Leffler

Allies Against Oppression: Intersectional Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and Rawlsian Liberalism

Marcus Arvan

The Case for Voting to Change the Outcomes Is Weaker Than It May Seem: A Reply to Zach Barnett

Amir Liron and David Enoch

Critical Levels, Critical Ranges, and Imprecise Exchange Rates in Population Axiology

Elliott Thornley