ARTICLE

Implanted Desires, Self-Formation, and Blame

Volume 3, Number 2, August 2009, Pages 1–19
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v3i2.33

Abstract

Some theories of moral responsibility assert that whether a person is accountable for her behavior depends partly on facts about her personal history. Those who advocate such a “historicist” outlook often hold, for example, that people who unwillingly acquire morally corrupt dispositions are not blameworthy for the wrong actions that issue from these dispositions; this contention is frequently supported by thought experiments involving instances of forced psychological manipulation that seem to call responsibility into question. I argue here against the historicist perspective on moral responsibility and in favor of the conclusion that the process by which a person acquires values and dispositions is largely irrelevant to moral responsibility. While the thought experiments introduced by historicists raise perplexing questions about personal identity and involve clear instances of moral wrongs done to the manipulated subjects, neither of these considerations typically have a direct bearing on the question of moral responsibility. Rather, questions about moral responsibility in manipulation cases should be answered, I argue, by considering whether a manipulated agent is capable of expressing through her actions the objectionable attitudes that make blame appropriate in normal cases of wrongdoing.
Copyright © 2009 Matthew Talbert
|

The Comparative Nonarbitrariness Norm of Blame

Daniel Telech and Hannah Tierney

Basically Deserved Blame and Its Value

Michael McKenna

Responsibility and the Social Dimension of Addiction

Keyao Yang

Crime, Public Health, and Inhumane Objectivity

Nadine Elzein

The Point of Blaming ai Systems

Hannah Altehenger and Leonhard Menges

The Right to Mental Autonomy: Its Nature and Scope

William Ratoff

Inclusive Blameworthiness and the Wrongfulness of Causing Harm

Evan Tiffany

Are All Deceptions Manipulative or All Manipulations Deceptive?

Shlomo Cohen

Is Morality Open to the Free Will Skeptic?

Stephen Morris

Quality of Will Accounts and Non-Culpably Developed Mental Disorders

Matthew Lamb

Defending the Epistemic Condition on Moral Responsibility

Martin Montminy

Resisting Tracing’s Siren Song

Craig K. Agule