DISCUSSION

Fake News and Conceptual Ethics

Volume 16, Number 2, November 2019, Pages 144–154
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v16i2.648

Abstract

In a recent contribution to conceptual ethics, Joshua Habgood-Coote argues that philosophers should refrain from using the term “fake news,” which is commonly employed in public discussions focusing on the epistemic health of democracies. In this short discussion note, I take issue with this claim, discussing each of the three arguments advanced by Coote to support the conclusion that we should abandon this concept. First, I contend that although “fake news” is a contested concept, there is significant agreement among contemporary philosophers about its key feature. Second, I argue against the claim that “fake news” is an unnecessary concept by underlying that it is not reducible to other terms we customarily use to describe the epistemic dysfunctions of democracies. Lastly, I suggest that using the term “fake news” need not serve propagandistic aims, and that philosophers can use this concept without engaging in epistemic policing, that is, commanding their interlocutors not to believe specific news stories or sources.
Copyright © 2019 Étienne Brown
|

Fake News and Democracy

Merten Reglitz

What’s New About Fake News?

Jessica Pepp, Eliot Michaelson, and Rachel Katharine Sterken

News Journalism and the Principles of Objectivity

Dhananjay Jagannathan and Clara Ence Morse

The Ethics of Continuing Harm

Joseph Chapa

Are Savior Siblings a Special Case in Procreative Ethics?

Caleb Althorpe and Elizabeth Finneron-Burns

Ethics and the Question of What to Do

Olle Risberg

Kidney Exchange and the Ethics of Giving

Philippe van Basshuysen

False Exemplars: Admiration and the Ethics of Public Monuments

Benjamin Cohen Rossi

Moral Fixed Points and Conceptual Deficiency: Reply to Ingram

Christos Kyriacou

Are the Moral Fixed Points Conceptual Truths?

Daan Evers and Bart Streumer

Self-Evidence and Disagreement in Ethics

Ryan Fanselow

Four Solutions to the Alleged Incompleteness of Virtue Ethics

Sean McAleer