Volume 2, Number 3
November 2008
ARTICLE

Hume’s Internalism Reconsidered

Volume 2, Number 3, November 2008, Pages 1–24
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v2i3.26
PDFPDF

Abstract

A standard reading of Hume on the nature of practical reasons holds that he is a normative internalist; that, for Hume, legitimate practical reasons must be linked to an agent’s set of desires or motivating passions. Though the internalist reading of Hume is popular, it gives rise to serious puzzles of interpretation. To pick one nearly at random, it appears that, on an internalist reading, Hume has serious difficulties in establishing that the so-called “artificial” virtues of justice and promise-keeping are reason-giving, especially when it comes to characters like the sensible knave. Some, skeptical of the internalist reading, have argued that Hume is in fact a nihilist about practical reasons, and admits no reasons for action at all. Against the internalist and skeptical readings, I argue that there is substantial reason to believe that Hume’s corpus is compatible with a far more robust account of normativity than even internalism allows. If so, I argue, Hume has a genuine response to the sensible knave that establishes the knave’s obligation to justice. As it turns out, Hume’s considered view is unique, underexplored, and merits further philosophical investigation.
Copyright © 2008 Dale Dorsey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

On Treating Something as a Reason for Action

Clayton Littlejohn

Instrumental Rationality: A Reprise

Joseph Raz

The Myth of Instrumental Rationality

Joseph Raz

How to Solve Prichard’s Dilemma: A Complex Contractualist Account of Moral Motivation

Travis N. Rieder

A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism

Matthew Bedke

Comment on Raz

R. Jay Wallace

Instrumental Rationality: Not Dead Yet

David Sobel

Instrumental Mythology

Mark Schroeder

Internalism, Ideal Advisors and the Conditional Fallacy

Alexander Hyun

Grounding Human Rights in Political Conceptions

Bosko Tripkovic

Rationality, Shmationality: Even Newer Shmagency Worries

Olof Leffler

The Procedure of Morality

Ori J. Herstein and Ofer Malcai

Portico