The Contribution of Security to Well-being

Jonathan Herington

doi:https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v14i3.559

Volume 14, Number 3
February 2019

ARTICLE

The Contribution of Security to Well-being

Volume 14, Number 3, February 2019, Pages 179–203

https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v14i3.559

PDF

Abstract

Do unknown and unrealized risks of harm diminish an individual’s well-being? The traditional answer is no: that the security of prudential goods benefits an individual only instrumentally or by virtue of their subjective sense of security. Recent work has argued, however, that the security of prudential goods non-instrumentally benefits an individual regardless of whether or not they enjoy subjective security. In this paper, I critically examine three claims about the way in which unknown and unrealized risks of harm might diminish individual well-being: (1) it frustrates a desire to be secure, (2) it frustrates the enjoyment of modally-robust goods, and (3) it undermines the ability to make reasonable plans. Ultimately, I argue that all three of these hypotheses are mistaken, but that they deepen our understanding of the ways in which subjective security is an important constituent of individual well-being.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

|

Desire Satisfaction and Temporal Well-Being: Time for a New View

Frederick Choo

Well-Being as Need Satisfaction

Marlowe Fardell

What Is Group Well-Being?

Eric Wiland

Quirky Desires and Well-Being

Donald W. Bruckner

Well-Being and Virtue

Daniel M. Haybron

A Hedonic Subjectivism

Daniel Pallies

Contractualism and Compensation for Risk Impositions

Richard Endörfer

Attraction, Aversion, and Meaning in Life

Alisabeth Ayars