Volume 3, Number 1
April 2009
DISCUSSION

Working Hard and Kicking Back: The Case for Diachronic Perfectionism

Volume 3, Number 1, April 2009, Pages 1–10
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v3i1.126
PDFPDF

Abstract

Dan Haybron has argued by counterexample that perfectionism fails as a theory of well-being. I respond by articulating two different versions of diachronic perfectionism, which takes into account the level of development and exercise of essential human capacities over the course of an entire lifetime.
Copyright © 2009 Antti Kauppinen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
|

Well-Being and Virtue

Daniel M. Haybron

The Case for Stance-Dependent Reasons

David Sobel

A Hedonic Subjectivism

Daniel Pallies

Desire Satisfaction and Temporal Well-Being: Time for a New View

Frederick Choo

Attraction, Aversion, and Meaning in Life

Alisabeth Ayars

More on the Hybrid Account of Harm

Charlotte Franziska Unruh

Not Living My Best Life: A Reply to Masny

Guy Fletcher

Remaining True to Ourselves: Dementia, Value Change, and Enduring Interests

Andrew Franklin-Hall

The Value of a Life-Year and the Intuition of Universality

Marc Fleurbaey and Gregory Ponthiere

Posthumous Repugnancy

Benjamin Kultgen

What Is the Bad-Difference View of Disability?

Thomas Crawley

Well-Being as Need Satisfaction

Marlowe Fardell

Portico